[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: re: [cam] Token notation
Martin, I'm not in love with it either - but supposedly this is pukka XPath style accessing. If you can convince me of something that is more natural and also reflects XPath (maybe XPath 2.0?) - I think that we should consider it. The idea behind the syntax as is - was that standard code written to parse XPath would be purposed to handle this. However - if this is not a valid assumption - lets re-visit this! It would also be nice to have a more object centric approach item.equal = 'testvalue' Thoughts? Thanks, DW. =================================================== Message text written by INTERNET:martin.me.roberts@bt.com >I hate the notation token='%param%'and contains(value,'testvalue') What would be wrong with equal(%param%,'testvalue') I am going to change my examples to this as I feel I can process them more easily. Martin<
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]