Re: CAM extras

["David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>]

Martin,

I just found this - back tracking thru stuff.

This one is simple - the ContentReference uses
the XPath to the element - so 

BuyerParty/Party/@partyID and then the parent UID is 
say OAG000100 for the generic partyID attribute, so 
as you are using it for BuyerParty - you can sub-version
off that say OAG000100:01

and then similarly for supplierParty.  Or of course - you
can create separate UIDs and then in the registry you
would do an associative link and notes there "uses" OAG000100,
etc.

I think we may want to add this to the implementation notes 
of the 0.14 Spec's...

Thanks, DW

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <martin.me.roberts@bt.com>
To: <david@drrw.info>
Cc: <david@drrw.net>
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 4:02 AM
Subject: RE: CAM extras


> David,
> One quetsion I asked you was how we did mapping.  You suggested
> the use of the UIDs from the Content section.  However, I have a
> question as to how things would work in the following situation:
> 
> <buyerParty>
> <Party partyID="1234"/>
> <Contact name="David Webber"/>
> </buyerParty>
> <supplierParty>
> <Party partyID="1234"/>
> <Contact name="David Webber"/>
> </supplierParty>
> 
> In the content assembly you would have 6 UID for this but how do
> you refer to the PartyID under Supplier rather than the one under buyer?
> It is a real shame that you get these small wrinkles in things.
> 
> Martin Roberts 
> xml designer, 
> BT Exact
> e-mail: martin.me.roberts@bt.com 
> tel: +44(0) 1473 609785  clickdial
> fax: +44(0) 1473 609834
> Intranet Site :http://twiki.btlabs.bt.co.uk/twiki
>