David,
Let’s schedule some time to be sure
I have all the meetings accurately recorded.
Thanks,
Brett
From: David RR Webber
(XML) [mailto:david@drrw.info]
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2006
11:35 AM
To: Brett Trusko
Cc: 'James Bryce Clark';
cam@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [cam] Inquiry about
status of spec & charter
Ok - that's great - yes please do!
Also - I think I can workup the charter stuff - should be couple
of one-liner changes / updates, review and then vote.
Let me know if there are specific other action items I need to work in
the meantime.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [cam] Inquiry about status of spec & charter
From: "Brett Trusko" <brett.trusko@oasis-open.org>
Date: Wed, November 01, 2006 2:20 pm
To: "'James Bryce Clark'" <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>,
<cam@lists.oasis-open.org>
Hi David et al.,
If this is just a matter of logging in I can take care of this for you.
David, please let me know if you want to talk about this.
Best,
Brett
-----Original Message-----
From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:jamie.clark@oasis-open.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:03 PM
To: cam@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [cam] Inquiry about status of spec & charter
OASIS CAM TC members:
I noted the recent uploading of a "release candidate"
v1.1 CAM
specification to the TC's repository. [1] We are pleased to see
this progress on a promising project. We will be happy to assist if
the committee plans to follow the path described in David Webber's
19 September message.[2]
In doing so, please advise me of the meeting schedule for the
TC. We do not have a record of any TC meetings during the last
year. If all business is to be conducted by asynchronous ballot,
the TC may wish to consider adopting a Standing Rule (as
contemplated by Section 2.4 of the OASIS TC Process)[3] to allocate
voting membership accordingly. Section 2,15 of those rules permits
and in some cases requires OASIS staff to close a technical
committee that falls below certain activity indicators -- one of
which is no meetings or specification ballots for a six month
period. So it would be helpful for us to be kept appraised of your
progress.
When you next act to approve a draft spec, you also should
update your charter [4], which currently sets no deliverables past
the already-approved v1.0 specification. The current additional
improvements should be added to the list of plans, so that the TC
does not appear to have completed its work, which also would trigger
closure.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions. I will
work
with your chairperson to frame appropriate resolutions.
Best regards JBC
~ James Bryce Clark
~ Director, Standards Development, OASIS
~ jamie.clark@oasis-open.org
[1]
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cam/document.php?document_id=20
830
[2]
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cam/email/archives/200609/msg00
005.html
[3] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php
[4] http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/cam/charter.php
|