[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [camp] Cloud Foundry Core
> Without some agreement the "name", the attribute space (e.g. "tomcatVersion", "javaVersion", etc.), and the value-space of those attributes - you can't tell if this template describes "the same service" as the ones described by Cloud Foundry (or some other registry). Yes, but that's OK I'd think. -Tobias On Nov 14, 2012, at 8:59, GILBERT PILZ <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com> wrote: > But what you get when you dereference the links in Platform.platformComponentTemplates[] is something like the following: > > { > "uri" : "http://slc03lgx.us.oracle.com/campSrv/PlatformComponentTemplate/2", > "name" : "Apache Tomcat 7.0.29", > "description" : "Bitnami TomcatStack 7.0.29-0", > "created" : "2012-09-10T16:34:00-0800", > "resourceState" : { > "state" : "READY" > }, > "tomcatVersion" : "7.0.29", > "javaVersion" : "1.6.0_33", > "servletVersion" : "3.0", > "jspVersion" : "2.2" > } > > Without some agreement the "name", the attribute space (e.g. "tomcatVersion", "javaVersion", etc.), and the value-space of those attributes - you can't tell if this template describes "the same service" as the ones described by Cloud Foundry (or some other registry). > > ~ gp > > On 11/14/2012 8:33 AM, Tobias Kunze wrote: >> I think we have a mechanism, although not one dedicated to discovering new services: Platform.platform_component_templates[]. No? >> >> -Tobias >> >> >> On Nov 14, 2012, at 8:02, Ashok Malhotra<ashok.malhotra@oracle.com> wrote: >> >>> Do we have an issue that covers service discovery or should we open one? >>> All the best, Ashok >>> >>> On 11/14/2012 7:47 AM, Behrens, Michael V CTR (US) wrote: >>>> Good info...Having a query REST API to get a list of services from a provider sounds like a basic/important interface. If new services are installed, they should be able to make themselves visible, however that might be an internal mechanism (outside the spec). >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: camp@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:camp@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Otto >>>> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 10:22 AM >>>> To: camp@lists.oasis-open.org >>>> Subject: [camp] Cloud Foundry Core >>>> >>>> Today there was an announcement in the news you should be aware of. The Cloud Foundry guys have made an attempt at cross-installation compatibility by defining supported application frameworks and services that applications can use. There is a test tool. If the list of standard ones is present, then you are considered compatible, and an application expecting those components is expected to work when moved to that platform. >>>> >>>> http://core.cloudfoundry.org/definition >>>> >>>> >>>> It seems simple, but it does validate the idea of keeping some registry or list of common common components, and a well defined way to check if a given application is expected to work on a target platform. >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: camp-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: camp-help@lists.oasis-open.org >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: camp-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: camp-help@lists.oasis-open.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: camp-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org > For additional commands, e-mail: camp-help@lists.oasis-open.org >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]