[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Draft Minutes 8th May 2013
Minutes 8th May 2013 Attendees: Rackspace Hosting, Inc. Roshan Agrawal Voting Member Oracle Mark Carlson Voting Member Oracle Martin Chapman Chair Fujitsu Limited Jacques Durand Voting Member Oracle Anish Karmarkar Voting Member Oracle Ashok Malhotra Voting Member Rackspace Hosting, Inc. Adrian Otto Secretary Vnomic Derek Palma Member Oracle Gilbert Pilz Voting Member Fujitsu Limited Tom Rutt Voting Member Software AG, Inc. Prasad Yendluri Voting Member Intro: Prasad assumes scribe duties. Roll: names listed above, 10 of 15 (66%), meeting is quorate. Topic: Agenda bashing. Add item on cloudplugfest Agenda approved Minutes: 1st May 2013: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/camp/email/archives/201305/msg00007.html Topic: 1st May 2013, Minutes approval MOTION: Anish moves, Ashok seconds, approve 1st May 2013 Minutes. passed w/o Topic: Administrivia Anish: Madrid , santa clara plugfest update ..Event 16th-18th sept, 13. Need volunteers for presentation.. Mark: Plugfest in Santa Clara. 3-days (M-W). W-Thu (maybe Fri) in Madrid. Critical mass would be in Santa Clara Martin: We can do plugfest remotely and have someone speak at both events Mark: Opp. to do BOF session & Demo of CAMP in Santa Clara Anish: Again any volunteers for Madrid or I will check with Alex offline Topic: Timeline Martin: still have 31 issues... Topic: Editing team update wd10 available incorporating Gils editorial pass. Topic: New Issues https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-66 Creating instance of a Platform Component Anish: Issue 30 (Parameters) resolution talks about parameters on a PlatformComponentTemplate and the fact that the platform MUST accept POST on .... PlatformComponentTempaltes that specify parameters. This is a new feature that we have introduced. ..Given this resolution, we might want to specific exactly how those POSTs work by adding another subsection in the protocol section. Otherwise we will not have interop Ashok: q? If you want to create instance of platform component right? MOTION: Anish: Moves to open CAMP-66 as priority P2, Ashok 2nds passed w/o Issue 66 is open Topic: Issue 58 https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-58 Justification for the common "created" attribute is unclear Gil's Proposal: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/camp/download.php/49108/camp-spec-v1.1-wd10-r2-issue-58.doc Overview of changes: Remove the description of the common created attribute from Section 5 Remove created from all outlines and examples Tom: Can you explain the rationale again? Gil: Nobody could think of why we need it.. Jacques: Want to make sure that, does not preclude things we want do.. e.g. eTag mechanism (based on time-stamp) Anish: eTags are on HTTP headers. One of the reasons we are deleting created att Jacques: Time-stamp kind of info better stored in logs. May be out of scope of model for CAMP Ashok: eTags are used on the server. Server might use created, modified etc. time-stamps MOTIONL Gil: Moves to accept his proposal to resolve issue 58, Anish: seconds RESOLUTION: Issue 58 resolved with Gil's proposal https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/camp/download.php/49108/camp-spec-v1.1-wd10-r2-issue-58.doc Passed w/o Topic: Issue CAMP-17 https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-17 Tom: People need to review what I proposed. I need to change my proposal to fix resolution to 58 Tom: futher explains his changes to the diagrams ... used UML notation w/o any migration arrows Don't want to vote on it today .. I will updated my proposal with changes to get rid of timestamp (issue 58) Topic: PDP Martin: Any updates from people involved in developing PDP further.. Gil: Explains the latest proposal (section 4.2 Deployment plan) One of the proposals is to require deployment plan to be YAML file Proposal: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/camp/download.php/49086/camp-spec-v1.1-wd10%20%282%29-issue-4-v3.doc Provides way to encapsulate TOSCA CSARs in CAMP PDP Adrian: Line numbers & examples seem off from what is referred to, in the description Anish: Suggests a way in Word? Tom: q on Target type different from resource type? Roshan: How do targettype name compare with requirement(...?) Derek: q reg. type name. Is that just a string or more semantics / interpretation? Gil: Needs thinking.. Derek: Concerned about proliferation of names.. Orig. q was on discovery and mapping Gil: we could also have Platform Component Templates enumerate all the types they claim to represent Anish: All that is discoverable from platform entrypoint Gil: so a PCT for Tomcat7 could claim "com.example.java:ServletContainer" *and* ?org.apache.tomcat:Tomcat7? Adrian: Does the proposal make clear what TargetType corresponds to.. Gil: may need some work in that area. Jacques: Is there a formal way to specify what is a valid PDP (YAML schema?) Derek: Where would things like deployment port be specified? Gil: there is an example for that sort of thing (customization) ... Gil further explains Tom: Is there going to be metadata for the requirements Gil: Add more data to the linktype Ashok: Q on example 4. Gil: explains where they stand in the sub-group on the proposal.. relationship between a component and its requirement is opaque, ... what a platform is supposed to do with the requirement Martin: Alex is trying to organize another call Gil: another problem related to deployment plan having a version Topic: AOB Straggler roll: Adrian and Derek Meeting Adjourned
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]