[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [camp] Issue 3: proposal direction with two choices
Glad you updated CAMP-3 with this link. Somehow I missed it first time round! Obviously it raises a question about my draft proposal for CAMP-65...
Q: What are the benefits of "pdpUri: cid:XXX" multi-part versus my suggestion of a single part and is it worth the overhead? *
Having the deployment plan also support cid: is nice as then artifacts could be part of the same multi-part.
* = also have we settled on how we treat abbreviations in camel case? i prefer pdpUri to pdpURI (otherwise you risk getting HTTPRESTAPI !)
You also raised ...
Q: multipart/form-data vs multipart/related
I'm not sure. Will have to investigate, but not now as I'll miss my flight! :O
You've probably chosen the right answer already of course.
On 01/05/2013 01:49, Anish Karmarkar wrote: