[OASIS Issue Tracker] Created: (CAMP-117) 4.3.3 Artifact Specification

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

4.3.3 Artifact Specification
----------------------------

                 Key: CAMP-117
                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-117
             Project: OASIS Cloud Application Management for Platforms (CAMP) TC
          Issue Type: Bug
            Reporter: Martin Chapman 


From the comment list:  https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/camp-comment/201309/msg00078.html
TAB issue: https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/TAB-92

Currently reads:

*****
This type describes an artifact of the application.
*****

1) type -> node? Yes?

2) cf my comments on "general representation"

3) It isn't clear if this is a production or an example. BTW, I was confused by the example not including the ArtifactSpecification node so I could judge my location in the PDP.

You write:

*****
name: String ?
description: String ?
tags: ?
  - String +
artifactType: String
content: ContentSpecification
requirements: ?
  -
    RequirementSpecification +
*****

When:

*****
  ArtifactSpecification
    name: String ?
    description: String ?
    tags: ?
      - String +
    artifactType: String
    content: ContentSpecification
    requirements: ?
      -
         RequirementSpecification +
*****

Would be clearer, given the similarity in syntaxes, at least to me.

For that matter, I would have put the production (if that is what it is) at the end of 4.3.3 and not at the front. So I have all the definitions before it.

4) BTW, since artifactType and content are both true, can I then have:

*****
  ArtifactSpecification
    name: String ?
    description: String ?
    tags: ?
      - String +
    artifactType: String
    requirements: ?
      -
         RequirementSpecification +
    content: ContentSpecification
*****

?

The ordering of nodes question that I posed earlier in another context.

5) The "production" in 4.3.2 DeploymentPlan indicates that ArtifactSpecification occurs at least once or more times. (+) But the language in 4.3.3, addresses an artifact described by the ArtifactSpecification with MAY be located language. Better to move the MAY language elsewhere, say as 4.3.3.4 Location of Artifacts. 

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira