OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

camp message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Issue Comment Edited: (CAMP-18) API Authentication/Authorization not clear and should leave scope for other auth mechanisms


    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-18?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=35199#action_35199 ] 

Martin Chapman  edited comment on CAMP-18 at 10/10/13 3:53 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

From 9th October 2013:


        MOTION: Adrian moves to resolve CAMP-18 with the  R3 proposal in JIRA. Seconded by Gil.
        Adrian Otto (Rackspace): Here is the link to the revised proposal for CAMP-18: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/camp/download.php/50987/camp-spec-v1.1-wd24-issue18-r3-ajo.doc
        Motion Carries.  CAMP-18 is resolved.

      was (Author: martin.chapman):
    From 9th October 2013:


        MOTIONL Adrian moves to resolve CAMP-18 with the  R3 proposal in JIRA. Seconded by Gil.
        Motion Carries.  CAMP-18 is resolved.
  
> API Authentication/Authorization not clear and should leave scope for other auth mechanisms
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMP-18
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-18
>             Project: OASIS Cloud Application Management for Platforms (CAMP) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Spec
>            Reporter: Anish Karmarkar
>            Assignee: Adrian Otto
>
> The spec talks about basic auth requirement:
> "Each request will be authenticated using HTTP Basic Authentication [RFC2617] unless otherwise noted."
> (Above, what does "will" mean, is it intended to be a MUST?)
> Unless I missed it somewhere reading the spec, looks like it does not talk about other authentication/authorization mechanism such as OAuth2. OAuth2 is still a draft but in practice its implemented/used by many. For example, if a "application developer", might be able to use OAuth2 access token[1] as HTTP Authentication header[2] or in some cases as URI query parameter while calling a vendor's CAMP APIs.
> It sounds like the spec intends to mandate basic auth as the only authentication mechanism. Perhaps it should allow OAuth2 or other authorization/authentication mechanism as extensibility or keep it open and adopt OAuth2 as it evolves during spec development.
> [1]http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-27#section-7
> [2]http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-19
> [This issue  was drupal issue # 1086]

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]