OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

camp message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] Updated: (CAMP-88) 1.5 PaaS Roles

     [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Martin Chapman  updated CAMP-88:

 resolved in wd26  - another issue -see section 1.5
 we changed PaaS roles to actors and added Application End-User actor
CNA fixed

> 1.5 PaaS Roles
> --------------
>                 Key: CAMP-88
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-88
>             Project: OASIS Cloud Application Management for Platforms (CAMP) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Public Review
>         Environment: Remove Application End-User from section 1.5.
> Change  "identifies" to "defines".
>            Reporter: Gilbert Pilz
>            Assignee: Gilbert Pilz
> Patrick Durusau makes the following PR comment (https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/camp-comment/201309/msg00015.html):
> The first two sentences in 1.5 Paas Roles read:
> *****
> There are many roles that can be defined for a PaaS environment. For
> the purposes of this specification we identify the following roles:
> *****
> Assuming 1.5 to be normative text, wouldn't:
> *****
> There are many roles that can be defined for a PaaS environment. This
> specification *defines* the following roles:
> *****
> But in checking the rest of the draft, it doesn't define Application
> End-User.
> So is the "define" in the first sentence incorrect?
> That is, should the draft *define* roles for a PaaS environment?
> Or are PaaS roles relevant to the purpose of the specification?
> That is anyone could implement the specification without reference to
> or definition of any PaaS roles? Certainly people in PaaS roles would
> use the implementation but are they required for the specification?
> At least in normative text?

This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]