[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (CAMP-166) CLONE - Response to call for comments: "application packag", "_uri", and "DP example"

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-166?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=36735#action_36735 ] 

Martin Chapman  commented on CAMP-166:
--------------------------------------

this was split from CAMP-164

> CLONE - Response to call for comments: "application packag", "_uri", and "DP example"
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMP-166
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-166
>             Project: OASIS Cloud Application Management for Platforms (CAMP) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SPEC PR2
>            Reporter: Martin Chapman 
>
> https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/camp-comment/201403/msg00000.html
> 2. Do the property names need "_uri" on the end? By putting that on, you prevent using the same property name in future for an inlined version of the linked resource (if a future spec version allows it, e.g. to allow the reduction of HTTP requests needed to get certain information/resources). A property named "operations" on an assembly resource (as indeed the arrow is labelled in the 2nd diagram in section 2.2.6) would have exactly the same semantics as a property named "operations_uri", when the value is a string containing a URI. The advantage of the former would be the possible widening of the allowed value type in future, as mentioned just now, where the value would be a JSON object rather than a string.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira