[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (CAMP-168) requirment_type is confusing for implementers
[ https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Martin Chapman updated CAMP-168: --------------------------------- Resolution: from 9th April 2014: Motion: m:Gil s:Adrian Open issue 170 motion approved w/o Motion: m:Gil s:Adrian Resolve issue 170 by fixing the typo in assembly.json file Motion approved w/o. Issue 170 is resolved > requirment_type is confusing for implementers > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: CAMP-168 > URL: https://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/CAMP-168 > Project: OASIS Cloud Application Management for Platforms (CAMP) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Spec > Reporter: Adrian Otto > > Solum is in the process of implementing a CAMP inspired model interpreter. The job of this component is to take Plan Files and PDP content as input, and auto-wire requirements to services, generate an orchestration template, and initiate the deployment of the assembly in accordance with the description in the Plan File. > In order to do wiring, there needs to be a programmatic matching of artifact requirements and service capabilities. Because the requirement_type is described as a *relationship* to be defined by the implementer, this makes the matching objective seem impossible. > Possible solutions might be to rename requirement_type to relationship_type, or change requirement_type to requirement_parameter_string, and provide guidance for how to use key/value pairs to inform a model interpreter to match those key/value pairs with characteristics from services. This would be much more useful, and help make the spec more crisp on this subject. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.1.1#6155)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]