[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [camp] Groups - camp-spec-v1.2-wd11-issue-186-v4.doc uploaded
There is a requirement that I forgot to review in today's meeting. It occurs at the top of Section 5.6, "collection Resource" and reads:
This requirement occurs within the context of the only other requirement that mentions the ETag header:
I thought RE-84 was necessary because, if the ETag refers to the particular subset in the collection resource, you can't use it to tell when the entire collection has changed from one GET to the next. I'd like some feedback on (a) the necessity for this requirement, (b) the phrasing of this requirement. This gets to the difference between the abstract notion of "the entire collection" versus the subset of the collection that is represented in a particular collection resource. Do people think RE-84 contradicts PR-20 in any way? ~ gp On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Gilbert Pilz <gilbert.pilz@oracle.com> wrote: Submitter's message |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]