[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (CAMP-232) 9 Conformance - Relationship btw mandatory and RFC2119 not defined
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/CAMP-232?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Anish Karmarkar updated CAMP-232: --------------------------------- Assignee: Martin Chapman > 9 Conformance - Relationship btw mandatory and RFC2119 not defined > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: CAMP-232 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/CAMP-232 > Project: OASIS Cloud Application Management for Platforms (CAMP) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: Conformance > Reporter: Chet Ensign > Assignee: Martin Chapman > Priority: Blocker > > The conformance target definitions in 9 Conformance share the form: > "...SHALL comply with all the CAMP ***** or ***** mandatory requirements listed in this specification, as summaried in Appendix C.1, "Mandatory Statements"." > Despite in invocation of RFC 2119, which provides levels of expectations for interchange in 1.6.2, the only expectation invoked by these conformance targets are with the keyword SHALL. > That is to say that the conformance requirements defined in Appendix C.2 Non-Mandatory, are discarded and rendered nugatory by this definition of conformance targets. Why SHOULD and MAY requirements are defined only to be ignored isn't clear. > SHOULD and MAY carry less force than SHALL but for interchange purposes, are not valueless. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]