[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (CAMP-223) 4.2.1 Types "encouraged" -> SHOULD?
[ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/CAMP-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=67218#comment-67218 ] Anish Karmarkar commented on CAMP-223: -------------------------------------- The TC agreed that this required no change. We don't quite know what kinds of "namespaces" will be used. Will have to wait till best practices emerge. See https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/camp/download.php/61273/20170720Minutes.txt > 4.2.1 Types "encouraged" -> SHOULD? > ----------------------------------- > > Key: CAMP-223 > URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/CAMP-223 > Project: OASIS Cloud Application Management for Platforms (CAMP) TC > Issue Type: Bug > Environment: Normative > Reporter: Chet Ensign > > 4.2.1 in addition to being a disclaimer of what CAMP (this specification?) does not define, contains the following: > "...To promote portability, both providers and consumers of the CAMP API are encouraged to namespace-qualify the types that they use....." > Isn't that a normative SHOULD? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2.2#6258)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]