[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re[3]: [cgmo-webcgm] RE intensity
Wednesday, July 14, 2004, 8:30:40 AM, Lofton wrote: LH> At 12:34 AM 7/14/2004 -0400, Benoit Bezaire wrote: >>Tuesday, July 13, 2004, 8:16:20 PM, Lofton wrote: >> >>[...] >>LH> That said, whether or not to say anything about clamping depends on what's >>LH> the error philosophy -- the equations can only yield out-of-range results >>LH> for illegal parameter values. >> >>Who said intensity had to be limited to [0,1]? :-) LH> Forrest did, in his original proposal, which I thought you had endorsed as LH> the way to go (I don't have the messages here on this system, to check it). You are right, he did say that: "Where intensity has a value from 0 to 1 and the colors range from 0 to 0xffff." But he also said: "If we are going the other way [meaning HLS] how do you make red more intense, make it black?" And to me, that last comment meant going above 1. Any way, let's talk and about this during the telecon. I think we're close to a decision. Regards, -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]