[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re[5]: [cgmo-webcgm] Question about NVDC and APS attributes
Thursday, December 2, 2004, 10:55:33 AM, Lofton wrote: LH> At 08:57 AM 12/2/2004 -0500, Benoit Bezaire wrote: >>Hi Dieter, >> >>Ok so according to you, there's only one; either viewContext or >>virtualViewContext. That's fine with me. I think it should be called >>'viewContext' even if it is expressed in NVDC. virtualViewContext is >>confusing. LH> I agree with you. After all, we don't call that other thingy "virtualRegion". Exactly. >>Besides, we have that section in the spec which explains >>that NVDC coords are used in the WebCGM DOM. >> >>I can wait a bit, but if nobody can justify having both of them, I >>suggest that we drop one (virtualViewContext). LH> I suggest that we (you and I, spec editors) drop it now for the pre-telecon LH> new WebCGM 2.0 draft. If someone can demonstrate in the telecon that we LH> have erred, then we can add it back. LH> Sound okay? Fine with me. -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com LH> -Lofton. >>Thursday, December 2, 2004, 8:17:15 AM, Dieter wrote: >> >>DW> well.... >> >>DW> I think that we decided to allow for setting a view context using a >>DW> setAttribute >>DW> call. The view context should be specified in NVDC to match all other >>DW> coordinates >>DW> used in the DOM context. So the view context became a virtual view >>context. >>DW> I am not 100% sure, but that's my only recollection. >> >>DW> Dieter >> >>DW> -----Original Message----- >>DW> From: Benoit Bezaire [mailto:benoit@itedo.com] >>DW> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 1:20 PM >>DW> To: CGM Open WebCGM TC >>DW> Subject: Re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] Question about NVDC and APS attributes >> >> >>DW> Wednesday, December 1, 2004, 8:12:56 PM, Lofton wrote: >> >>LH>> At 04:04 PM 12/1/2004 -0500, Benoit Bezaire wrote: >> >>>[...] >> >>>Second, could someone explain to me what virtualViewContext means? >> >>LH>> Huh? Where did this come from? Is this something we invented in the >>LH>> post-Houston, 11/16 telecon? >>DW> I don't know where it came from; the only thing I remember is that you >>DW> and Dieter understood its meaning. >> >>LH>> I wonder if this is the "target rectangle" concept from section 3.2 of >>LH>> Dieter's object behaviors proposal, which we discussed in the telecon >>DW> right >>LH>> after Houston? >>DW> maybe? >> >>DW> -- >>DW> Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com >> >>LH>> >>DW> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cgmo-webcgm/email/archives/2004 >>DW> 11/doc00001.doc >> >>LH>> If so, then I'm pretty sure it should *not* be an ApsAttr. Therefore, >>DW> it >>LH>> shouldn't be in the DOM. Is this what you would call a "shadow DOM" >>LH>> entity? I can see someone wanting to inquire it, possibly (but let's >>DW> make >>LH>> sure there is a strong use case, rather than adding more functions >>LH>> gratuitously). It should not, however, be settable. >> >>LH>> -Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]