[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] Comments on chapter 1
Following Benoit's lead, here is a preview of what I want to look at in Chapter 1... Section 1.1: is the "profile" all of WebCGM 2.0, or is it just the graphics + APS stuff (excluding XCF and DOM)? On the one hand, the former fits my definition of profile (of CGM:1999) better. On the other hand, there may be "political" reasons (w/ W3C) to call the whole thing (all of WebCGM 2.0) the profile. Section 1.2: a requirements document (esp for XCF & DOM) would be nice. Esp. for W3C purposes. Section 1.4: cascading profiles reference needs to be finished. Also, I think Cascading Profiles permission should be indicated in the Abstract, since we are about to lose control of the copyright. Section 1.4: should AECMA or its successor be mentioned, as well as ATA (or are they becoming the same?). Section 1.5: should there be a Conformance Clause? (I think "yes", from W3C QA work.) Where should it be? Here? or a normative separate later chapter / appendix? Is it all normative, or is it a mixture? Section 1.x: lso, do "normative reference" belong in non-normative Chapter 1? Or should we have them in a normative appendix? (Or somewhere else altogether?) All: questions or suggestions for Chapter 1? -Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]