[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Question about WebCGM DTD
The chapter 5 from the Munich meeting is marked with the following comments from Franck and Dave: "Globally, it seems to me that we should have some wording/links to justify the content model of our elements. Clarify why the extensions to the content model occur at the end of the individual content for each element". I originally had a hard time understanding what needed to be clarified? After looking at the DTD in more detail, I think I now understand. Let's look at 'grobject', its content is currently defined as: <!ENTITY % grobjectEXT "" > <!ELEMENT grobject ( linkuri* %grobjectEXT; )> Hence the comments, but to the best of my knowledge, that's an error, it should be: <!ENTITY % grobjectEXT "" > <!ELEMENT grobject ( linkuri %grobjectEXT; )* > Do people remember ever taking the decision that extended elements must be the last child of its parent element in the XML companion file. To me, this should be valid: <grobject apsId="myId"/> <linkuri .../> <ben:myElem .../> <ben:anotherElem .../> <linkuri .../> </grobject> If I correct the DTD, is a justification for our content model still required? -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]