Re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] getWebCGMViewerVersion() poll results

[Benoit Bezaire <benoit@itedo.com>]

Ok, the Bs have won...  5 to 3 now.

Dave, can we mark this down as a resolution?

Lofton will then add the methods to the spec.
(Note, I say we document the APIs, if the OASIS/W3C gives us a hard
time, we simply pull them out).

-- 
 Benoit   mailto:benoit@itedo.com

 
Monday, May 30, 2005, 10:47:01 AM, Ulrich wrote:

UL> I also vote for B.

UL> ----- Original Message ----- 
UL> From: Benoit Bezaire <benoit@itedo.com>
UL> To: <cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org>
UL> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2005 3:50 PM
UL> Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] getWebCGMViewerVersion() poll results


>> Hi,
>> 
>>   We have 3 votes for A (Forrest, Don, Benoit) and 3 votes for B
>>   (Stuart, Dave, Frank). Implementors vs users :-)
>> 
>>   Since I believe this to be a very minor issue compared to other
>>   things we have to resolved; I propose we let the Editor (Lofton)
>>   break the tie (I suspect every body to be telling themselves "let's
>>   just agree on something" :). (It's the case for me).
>> 
>> 
>> Proposal A:
>> string getWebCGMViewerVersion()
>>   returns a string identifying the User Agent being used (ex: Lofton's
>>   viewer v3.2.2)
>> 
>> Proposal B:
>> string getAppName()
>>   returns the application name (ex: Lofton's viewer).
>> 
>> string getAppVersion()
>>   returns the application version number (ex: 3.2.2)  
>> 
>>   Regards,
>>   
>> -- 
>>  Benoit                 mailto:benoit@itedo.com