Re: [cgmo-webcgm] XCF fragment

[Benoit Bezaire <benoit@itedo.com>]

Hi Dieter,

The way I look at it is this:

If I move the link
http://www.cgmopen.org/mycgm.cgm#xcf(myxcf.xml)
to
http://www.example.org/mytest.html
instead of
http://www.itedo.com/mytest.html

Am I expecting to have to move the xml file also? I would say no, and
therefore agree with your suggestion, it should be relative to the cgm
file, not the html.

-- 
 Benoit   mailto:benoit@itedo.com

 
Wednesday, June 1, 2005, 8:49:19 AM, Dieter wrote:

DW> All,

DW> I have a question regarding the usage of XCF fragments.
DW> Consider the following URL:


DW> http://www.cgmopen.org/mycgm.cgm#xcf(myxcf.xml)

DW> This link resides on an HTML page located at

DW> http://www.itedo.com/mytest.html


DW> So the cgm URL is not relative to the html, however, the xml URL
DW> is a relative one.

DW> Question:
DW> where is the XML file?

DW> 1. http://www.itedo.com/myxcf.xml   (relative to html file)
DW> 2. http://www.cgmopen.org/myxcf.xml (relative to cgm file)

DW> Suggestion: 2.

DW> Reason:
DW> a relative URL inside the CGM in a linkURI would be considered relative to
DW> the CGM file as well.
DW> no strong preference, but it needs to be resolved.

DW> Regards,
DW> Dieter