[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] ISSUE: visibility & interactivity at picture level
Hi Benoit, see inline > -----Original Message----- > From: Benoit Bezaire [mailto:benoit@itedo.com] > Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 7:22 PM > To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] ISSUE: visibility & interactivity at picture > level > > > Hi Lofton, > > I tend to agree with you... > > For visibility, I don't really see why someone would want to make the > entire picture invisible. So this one doesn't concern me very much. set visibility of entire picture to off. set visibility of one object to on. I agree, this is for completeness only. > > For interactivity, if someone wanted to make the entire picture > non-interactive, a script writer could do: > > var meta = objectId.getWebCGMMetafile(); > var pic = meta.pic; > var nodes = pic.firstChild; > > while( nodes ) > { > nodes.setAppStructureAttr("interactivity","off"); > nodes = nodes.nextSibling; > } > > I think (personally) that this is an acceptable workaround for the > WebCGM 2.0 timeframe. Yes. Let's resolve this in 2.1. ->add to requirements list for 2.1 Dieter > > -- > Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com > > > Monday, June 13, 2005, 12:39:17 PM, Lofton wrote: > > LH> From Dieter's comments: > LH> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200506/msg00021.html > > LH> ISSUE: visibility interactivity at picturelevel > > LH> 3.2.2.9 > LH> how do we state that visibility can be set at picture level? > > LH> 3.2.2.10 > LH> how do we state that interactivity can be set at picturelevel? > > > LH> DISCUSSION. We have three things to consider: > LH> WebCGM(metafile instances), DOM, XCF. > > LH> In WebCGM... Since these are APS Attributes, it can't be > LH> done in a straight forward manner. You can achieve the effect (at > LH> least for visibility, maybe for interactivity) by wrapping the > LH> whole picture body in an APS. Or apply the attributes to the > LH> layers in a layered picture. In DOM or XCF, not currently > LH> possible. Various solutions that come to mind -- for WebCGMs > LH> and/or DOM and/or XCF --either violate CGM:1999, or create > LH> incompatibility between the three functional areas, or are hacks. > > LH> This is not going to be a simple problem to solve cleanly. > LH> If it is not an *important* use case, it might be a good strategy > LH> that we postpone the solution. > > LH> RECOMMENDATION: don't try to solve it in 2.0. > > LH> Regards, > LH> -Lofton. > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]