[no subject]

A conflict between two normative sections in WebCGM 1.0 concerning the =
use of the name
attribute with para and subpara APS types was identified. Lofton will =
propose an errata statement to address this.

This was related to the issue that the content model in Webcgm 1.0 3.3 =
was normative and should have been declared informative.  There were =
several places that referred to the content model as the normative =
definition of the allowable content.

thx...Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 10:52 AM
To: Cruikshank, David W; cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] UTF-8 & UTF-16 sequences (ISSUEs)


At 10:02 AM 6/24/2005 -0700, Cruikshank, David W wrote:
>Issue 1: For completeness, I lean towards Alt 2,

As I argued in my reply to Robert, this completeness comes with a price.

>since there are some other errata that needs to be created for WebCGM =
1.0=20
>that we haven't done yet, but I'm not hard over on it.

Do you have a list of these other errata?  (I don't, and I'm unsure what =

they are.)

-Lofton.