Resolving relative URIs

[Benoit Bezaire <benoit@itedo.com>]

Hi,

Section 3.1.1.5 Resolving relative URIs

says the following:

For the 'xcfurl' parameter of the xterm production in the above EBNF,
a relative URI is resolved relative to the WebCGM instance with which
the XML Companion File is a companion -- i.e. relative to the base
part of the URI containing the fragment -- rather than relative to the
file containing the URI reference (e.g., a HTML file).

I think a similar statement (or a link to this one) should be included
in the applyCompanionFile() method. It doesn't make much sense for the
'xcfurl' parameter to use the above rule and for applyCompanionFile
not to say anything about relative URIs.

Proposal:
Clarify applyCompanionFile() wording so that relative URIs are
relative to the WebCGM instance instead of the HTML file.

Kind regards,

-- 
 Benoit                 mailto:benoit@itedo.com