Timing for defects processing

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

All --

Whatever we decide about NUBS/NURBS in WebCGM 2.0, the CGM:1999 defects 
need to be fixed.

Here is Dick Puk's reply to my inquiry (he is SC24/WG6 Chair).  I wrote 
back and told him there could be one additional, related defect (our #3 
topic, which dialog I haven't had time to review yet.)  Therefore requested 
that he hold till we make that determination.

Regards,
-Lofton.

>From: "Richard F. Puk" <puk@igraphics.com>
>To: "'Lofton Henderson'" <lofton@rockynet.com>
>Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 10:57:31 -0700
>[...]
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com]
> > Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 7:06 AM
> > To: RIchard F. Puk
> >
> > [...]
> > We had prepared a defect report for CGM:1999.  See attached.
> > My guess is that it never got submitted to SC24 for
> > processing.  Question.  If it were submitted now, what is the
> > process to get approval?  What is the best-case scenario for
> > schedule (and worst-case)?
>
>The defect can be immediately balloted. I will submit it as WG6 Chair acting
>as CGM Defects Rapporteur. I believe that it can be balloted by E-mail
>within SC24 but will ask Jose for advice. Best case, it could be approved in
>about a month. Worst case, it could take two to three months.
>
>If this is the only defect, I will submit it immediately. If there any
>others, please let me know so that they can be batched together.
>[...]
>This does not appear to be controversial.