Dieter's CD2 comments -- Section 3.1 -- first

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

Ref:  http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200509/msg00093.html
Comments:  16, 17-19, 22, 25, 27, 28
==========

This collection of comments, all within 3.1, are pretty much editorial, 
although some need explanation.  I'll send a few other 3.1-comment 
messages, that have more substantive implications and may need discussion.

Comments #17, 18, 19, 25, 27:  just as suggested by Dieter.

Comment 16:
-----
If you look at these three pieces of text, taken together, I think there is 
little ambiguity:
[[[
3.1.1.2 fragment grammar:
==>behavior ::=  "_blank" | "_self" | "_parent" | "_replace" | "_top" | target
3.1.1.3 Fragment Character Repertoire:
==>"The productions 'picid', 'target', 'objid', and 'objname' in the 
fragment grammar [above]..."
3.1.1.3, #1, 4th bullet:
==>"target - further restrictions: as objid, plus further restricted per 
"Frame Target Name" of HTML 4.01 (e.g., must begin with a-zA-Z)"
]]]
So IMO 'target' is distinguished from _blank etc, and the HTML reference 
reinforces that.
QUESTION.  Would it be helpful to reword, "target - further restrictions: 
as objid, plus must begin with a-zA-Z, similarly to "Frame Target Name" of 
HTML 4.01, upon which the set of WebCGM picture behaviors is based."

Comment 22:
-----
As resolved in an issue this summer, all references to HTML should be to 
4.01, so the 4.0 reference is an editorial oversight.

Discussion welcome.

Regards,
-Lofton.