[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: new implementation matrix
Vendors, see first part; All, see second part: Vendors (Don, Dieter, Forrest, Rob, Ulrich) -- Here is a new version of the matrix: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cgmo-webcgm/download.php/16967/matrix.html I fixed the omitted static tests -- transp01, NURBS01, NURBS02, and restored Don's status on the static tests. Also, I have added (on FTP as well) the full suite of Chinese tests (they all have full Font Properties information now): utf16-chinese-v10 utf16-chinese-v20 utf8-chinese-v10 utf8-chinese-v20 ACTION: All vendors please check and let me know about the newly-listed static tests. (And any other status changes, e.g., on CGM_Metafile.) I have taken the liberty to update Itedo & SDI, who were involved with the unicode tests. (Please correct me if I have any of it wrong.) All -- QUESTION. We now have utf16-japanese-v10. I'm thinking that we don't need to duplicate that test in all 4 flavors, because the flavors should be adequately tested with the Chinese suite. So maybe just one flavor of (this) japanese test would suffice, utf16-japanese-v20. What do you think? (I don't mind adding 'em all -- it's not that much work, but does it test anything new and useful?) Regards, -Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]