[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] Error in nurbs01 test
Rob, Checking this out... At 02:03 PM 3/8/2006 -0700, Robert Orosz wrote: >[...] > >There is an error in the nurbs01 test in the test suite. It appears that >the interpreter/viewer used to generate the reference PNG image ignored the >weights in the NURBS element. I just looked on the FTP site, and there is no NURBS01.PNG there! So for starters, what are you looking at for the reference PNG? In my working directory, I have a NURBS01.PNG that looks pretty circular. Dave has just sent me an earlier version that looks lopsided circular -- there is a little extra bulge at 0, 90, 180, 270. I have attached a reduced-size (400x400 instead of 2300x2300) version. Does that look right to you? If not, what do you *think* the PNG should look like? Regards, -Lofton. >To illustrate my point, I've generated an >equivalent file (without the boilerplate text labels) containing a NUBS >element which is unweighted by definition. The knot vector is identical to >the nurbs01 test, and I've placed the control points at metrically >equivalent positions in VDC space. This file views identically to the NURBS >element in the NURBS01.cgm file as depicted in the PNG image. Applying >weights to the spline should significantly alter the shape of the curve. > >You could do an equivalent test by using your convert program to remove the >weights in the NURBS element (i.e. set them all to 1.0) in the NURBS01.cgm >file. You will see similar results. > >Regards, > >Rob > > <<NUBS01_rob.cgm>>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]