[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re[4]: [cgmo-webcgm] Issue CL-c2: Can a WebCGM 2.0 picture link to a multi-picture
At 10:34 AM 3/24/2006 -0500, Benoit Bezaire wrote: >Friday, March 24, 2006, 10:14:25 AM, you wrote: > > > At 09:11 AM 3/24/2006 -0500, Benoit Bezaire wrote: > >>Hi Lofton, > >> > >>We did decide not to change the EBNF. I don't feel like searching all > >>the minutes for that resolution though. It was agreed upon so that > >>_most_ 1.0 files could be handled easily by a 2.0 viewer. > > > Well, picseqno=1 *is* a change to 1.0 EBNF. >Yes it is... and yet the spec say and I quote "For backward >compatibility with existing viewer implementations, the fragment >syntax is unchanged with regard to the picterm." which is not true! Indeed. > > Or are you saying that we decided not to change it any more, after > > that change? >I'm saying we decided to make as few changes as possible. Actually I >don't recall how this picseqno=1 change made it in there? But it >doesn't matter, that's the situation we have now and that's what we >have to deal with. So it's a mistake that no one noticed before Chris's comment ... let's undo it. AFTER we hear from others, that is. -Lofton > >>I personally have no objections for removing the picseqno=1 > >>restriction to make this problem go away. Others have to express their > >>opinion though. > > > It seems so much cleaner, not to mention making life easier for > > cascading multi-pic profiles, and it doesn't change any rules about > > 2.0 being single-pic. >I agree. > > > Yes, let's hear from others. >Please. > > > -Lofton. > >-- > Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com > >This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected >by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware >that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or >any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in >error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and >delete this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]