[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] Did we miss something?
Ben, I think you do have to use the bindByName call to apply an XCF via a name attribute. I don't think there is any other way to do it. Are you talking about addiing/modificating a name attribute via the XCF? I thought name was readonly.. Thx...Dave Technical Fellow - Graphics/Digital Data Interchange Boeing Commercial Airplane 206.544.3560, fax 206.662.3734 <-- NEW NUMBERS david.w.cruikshank@boeing.com -----Original Message----- From: Benoit Bezaire [mailto:benoit@itedo.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 7:18 AM To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] Did we miss something? Hi guys, I was looking into the XCF stuff lately... more precisely the "a la Duluc" scenario... where a user may want a companion file not for 'apply' purpose, but mainly for documentation. I'm assuming a user may want the companion file in the following structure (for documentation purposes): <grobject id="obj1" screentip="a tip"/> <para id="obj2" screentip="another tip"/> I'm assuming that for the documentation case, that it doesn't make much sense to use the <bindByName> and <bindById> tags as is caries less information (you lose the aps type). So, assuming my assumptions are correct; where's the 'name' attribute in the DTD? It seems like I'm not allowed to do: <grobject id="obj1" name="drawing"/> Did we miss something? -- Benoit mailto:benoit@itedo.com This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and delete this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]