[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] Potential table 3.1.2.7
At 01:22 PM 4/14/2006 -0700, Galt, Stuart A wrote: >Hello, > >Here is another try at 3.1.2.7. No tables this time! I think it works better without the table. Other opinions? (There are some editorial glitches, but I can take care of most of those when I integrate whatever the TC agrees on.) -Lofton. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 6:11 AM > > To: dieter@itedo.com; Galt, Stuart A; 'CGM Open WebCGM TC' > > Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] Potential table 3.1.2.7 > > > > I may have misunderstood the conclusion at last week's > > telecon, but I thought we would get rid of the table and > > replace it with something like nested bullet lists, or terse > > prose text, or something like that -- something more verbose, > > in any case, that will be clear about where to look > > (link) for the normative presentation of the rules about the > > particular cases. > > > > -Lofton. > > > > At 09:30 AM 4/12/2006 +0200, Dieter Weidenbrück wrote: > > >Stuart, > > > > > >one comment: > > >The first entry in the table lists an object behavior > > "without picterm". > > >Please note that some forms of the fragment require the full > > fragment, > > >i.e. picterm.objterm. > > >So I suggest to change the wording of that entry to something like > > >"picBehavior will be ignored". > > > > > >Also, for valid WebCGM 1.0 files as well as any cascaded > > multi-picture > > >files, the picterm might point to another picture in the same file, > > >which should be legal. > > > > > >Dieter > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Galt, Stuart A [mailto:stuart.a.galt@boeing.com] > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 1:14 AM > > > > To: CGM Open WebCGM TC > > > > Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] Potential table 3.1.2.7 > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > After playing with the table in 3.1.2.7 and trying all sorts of > > > > things made it much worse I finally began to understand it (I > > > > think). I left the targets of the links the same, but > > changed the > > > > callouts a bit to help if it was used in printed form. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Stuart Galt > > > > SGML Resource Group > > > > stuart.a.galt@boeing.com > > > > (206) 544-3656 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]