[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: namespace, sys. identifier, etc
Reference: http://www.w3.org/Submission/2006/SUBM-WebCGM20-20060313/WebCGM20-XCF.html#namespace Question: should any of this stuff in 4.2.3 be different in a W3C version of the standard? My initial inclination is "no". For example, if there is one and only one XCF syntax (which we clearly desire), then I don't think we want two different, equivalent XCF namespace URIs, do we? The namespace URI doesn't dereference to anything normative (but rather to a little user-friendly placeholder explanation). But in that same section, the System Identifier, http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/v2.0/webcgm20.dtd , does dereference to the normative DTD. On the premise that we don't want equivalent but different OASIS-compliant-XCFs and W3C-compliant-XCFs, I think both versions need to say the same thing here. It does bring up an interesting logistical detail -- when W3C changes webcgm20.dtd during the W3C development cycle, it needs to be updated simultaneously in OASIS web space. Thoughts? I came upon this, because I'm preparing the proposed-changes.html (TC to WG) document that we discussed yesterday, and actually trying out the recommended edits simultaneously, as a sanity check. I'm thinking that we should ask Chris about it also, as he has some direct experience with cross-organization standards (W3C & ISO on PNG). -Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]