re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] Visibilty & Interactivity defaults

[Don Larson <dlarson@cgmlarson.com>]

Benoit,

  > Just a note for now.
  > We can't based an implementation on a test suite. It needs to be based
  > on an interpretation of the specification. If the specification does
  > not provide the answer, we need to fix it.

I agree!  But I cannot determine from the Specification what the
defaults for Visibilty & Interactivity are when there no 
APS ATTRIBUTEs defined in the CGM.

Don.


  > -- 
  > Regards,
  >  Benoit   mailto:benoit@itedo.com

  > This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected
  > by legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware
  > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or
  > any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in
  > error, please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and
  > delete this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. 


  > Tuesday, May 16, 2006, 2:39:15 PM, you wrote:

  > > All,

  > > What are the defaults for the Visibility and Interactivity attributes
  > > when they are not present in the CGM?

  > > The AppStructure-interactivity test suggest that all APS have 
  > > an Interactivity attribute even though there is no APS ATTRIBUTE 
  > > of type "interactivity" in the CGM as is the case for 
  > > AppStructure-interactivity.cgm

  > > The AppStructure-visibility test suggest that APS do NOT have a
  > > "visibility" attribute when no APS ATTRIBUTE of type "visibility" 
  > > is present in the CGM.

  > > Can anyone clarify this for me.

  > > Regards, 
  > > Don.