Re: WebCGM implementors -- high priority action

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

Hi Benoit,

Thanks for your results.  Answers to your question embedded.

At 11:01 AM 8/8/2006 -0400, Benoit Bezaire wrote:

> > II.) CHANGED DYNAMIC01 TESTS:
> > =====
> > At 11:00 AM 8/3/2006 -0700, Cruikshank, David W wrote:
> >>3) Vendor results of 9 WebCGM 1.0 dynamic test that were modified
> >>for WebCGM 2.0 behavior. See dynamic tests from 1.0 that were
> >>upgraded for 2.0 in current test suite: Find them in download of the
> >>test suite: http://www.w3.org/2006/Graphics/WebCGM/testsuite.html
>
> > The nine tests are:
>
> > linking-selectId-BE-05
>Pass.
>
> > linking-selectName-BE-06
>Pass.
>
> > linking-anyURI-BE-07
>Pass.
>
> > behavior-objHighlight-BE-05
>Fail (we don't highlight and we do not display a full picture view).
>
> > behavior-objHighlightAll-BE-06
>Fail (we don't highlight and we do not display a full picture view).
>
> > behavior-objViewContext-BE-07
>Qualified, we don't highlight but zoom to viewcontext.
>
> > fragment-fiveForms-BE-03
>Qualified, we don't highlight when clicking on 2nd hyperlink.
>
> > otherAPS-para-BE-01
>Pass.
>
> > otherAPS-para-BE-02
>Pass.
>
> > (Note. There was a bug in the list in a previous email, whereby one
> > test was repeated twice.)
>
> > What are your implementation results for each of these nine
> > 2.0-modified Dynamic10 tests: Pass, Fail, Qualified? (Choose
> > "Qualified" for "partial", or "claim test is wrong", or ... -- and
> > explain the reason.)
>See above.
>
> > If "Fail" or "Qualified", please estimate when you could also
> > achieve "Pass".
>
> > Current status: one implementor has reported -- five tests Pass and
> > four Fail (indef). We could be "at risk" here.
>Is that us?

No, it's SDI.  I have the changed-9 results from you and from 
Forrest.  Have a look at the attached matrix (work-in-progress).

Caveat:  The only results in the attached that are real are the changed-9 
for you and for Forrest.  (Hence the parenthetical "(9)" after your column 
heading.  All other apparent "Ok", for the other vendors as well as for you 
and Forrest, are simply matrix initialization.  (Note also that I need to 
remove TI column, as it is static-only.)

Let's talk about this tomorrow (Wednesday).

Regards,
-Lofton.

Title: WebCGM 2.0 Test Suite & Implementation Matrix

WebCGM 2.0 "dynamic10" Implementation Matrix
Release n.nn - dd MMM 2006

Latest version:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/test-materials/dynamic-matrix.html

This version:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/test-materials/...etc...

Previous version:

http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/test-materials/...etc...

This document describes the results of WebCGM 2.0 implementations tested against dynamic-graphics tests of the WebCGM 2.0 Test Suite which are derived from and mostly identical to the dynamic tests of the WebCGM 1.0 Test Suite (with updates to nine tests to adjust for some changed rules).

Information about the implementations and a legend explaining the table are found after the table.

WebCGM 1.0/2.0 dynamic tests
Test Name	IsoView(9)	VizEx	SDI Reader(9)	MetaWeb	Comments
linking-basicH2C-BE-01	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
linking-basicC2H-BE-02	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
linking-basicC2C-BE-03	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
linking-basicC2P-BE-04	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
linking-selectId-BE-05+	Ok	Ok	Fail	Ok
linking-selectName-BE-06+	Ok	Ok	Fail	Ok
linking-anyURI-BE-07+	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
linking-multiLink-BE-08	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
behavior-picBlankC2C-BE-01	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
behavior-picReplaceC2C-BE-02	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
behavior-picBlankC2H-BE-03	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
behavior-picTargetC2H-BE-04	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
behavior-objHighlight-BE-05+	Fail	Ok	Ok	Ok
behavior-objHighlightAll-BE-06+	Fail	Ok	Ok	Ok
behavior-objViewContext-BE-07+	Qualified	Ok	Ok	Ok
fragment-idC2H-BE-01	Qualified	Ok	Ok	Ok
fragment-fiveForms-BE-03	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
interact-pick-BE-01	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
interact-pickRegion-BE-02	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
interact-screenTip-BE-03+	Ok	Ok	Ok	Ok
otherAPS-para-BE-01+	Ok	Ok	Fail	Ok
otherAPS-para-BE-02+	Ok	Ok	Fail	Ok

Implementations Tested

The following table lists the implementations that are covered by the test results.

Company	Name**	Product	Version	Platform
Itedo Software	IsoView	IsoView	6.0	Windows XP
Larson Software Technology	VizEx	VizEx	[tbd]	[tbd]
System Development Inc	SDI Reader	SDI Reader	[tbd]	[tbd]
Ematek GmbH	MetaWeb	MetaWeb	3.0	Windows XP
Auto-trol Technology (viewer portion for static gfx)	TI	Tech Illustrator	[tbd]	Windows XP

** Nickname used for the viewer in the below tables (to distinguish multiple viewers from a Company).

"(!)" after the product nickname in the table headers indicates complete actual results. Otherwise, it is just table initial value, or incomplete results.

Legend

Type	Description
Ok	Implementation passes test
Fail(date)	Implementation does not pass test. (Committed pass date)***
Qualified(date)	Implementation passes part of the test, but not enough to give a full pass. (Committed pass date.)***
Unknown	The implementation behavior is unknown or indeterminate for the test.
Inactive	An implementation is planned, but not yet advanced enough for testing.

*** 'indef' means that vendor cannot estimate or commit, when it will pass.