Re: AW: [cgmo-webcgm] Groups - WebCGM_21_Requirements.html uploaded

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

At 02:24 AM 8/15/2007 -0400, Weidenbrueck, Dieter wrote:
>[...]
>I think a main requirement for the group is a firm commitment of each 
>vendor to support every single feature in a timely fashion that we will 
>start discussing now.

Yes indeed.

>Otherwise we will run into challenges with W3C (missing implementations), 
>have interoperability problems between vendors, and during development of 
>the spec we will be suffering from a lack of expertise because not 
>everybody is equally prepared for discussions.

To help prepare, I have posted an new version.  (I don't anticipate any 
more significantly different new versions before F2F.)

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/cgmo-webcgm/download.php/24997/WebCGM_21_Requirements.html

I have ensured that every item has a status, and they are color-coded.  Red 
means that there has been zero (significant) activity since origination of 
the item (usually Clearwater).  Yellow means little activity -- no 
conclusive discussion yet to accept or reject the item.  Green means ... 
well, it's showing signs of life.

-Lofton.