OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cgmo-webcgm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] transparency -- conceptual recommendations


Hi Lofton,

I'm trying to understand all of this. I'm confused about the V1/V3 stuff
(wasn't around early on)... for #B, what is Transparency suppose to do?

For #C, when you say "for any cell whose color matches the specified
TCC", does color match mean R, G, B and A components (all four) or only
RGB (color only, transparency is irrelevant)?

For #D, don't you mean "to 1 (opaque)"? if (0,0,0,0) is transparent
black; (r,g,b,1) should be opaque.

For #F, we could say DON'T DO THIS. However, I think the last paragraph
of 2.2.2 covers this case: it's an additional temporary canvas.

For #G, I don't believe we support that attribute. Who does? The
equations work with premultiplied values, so (r,g,b,0) where r,g,b is >
0 is impossible. I would instead assume that the way to implement this
is to initialize the background to transparent black and blend the "CGM"
result into the HTML background. Is it possible that the working group
added the 'background' attribute without knowing the implementation
implications, which are (I think): windowless activeX controls and alpha
blending support (on Windows at least). If no vendor supports this
attribute, I think we should deprecate it in 2.1.

Hope my comments help a bit,
Benoit.

-----Original Message-----
From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 8:00 PM
To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] transparency -- conceptual recommendations

Hi All --

Here is my analysis of the transparency functionality in WebCGM.  I have
summarized the possible sources, given recommendations, and proposed
preliminary *conceptual* changes to the spec.  After we agree on those,
I'll actually draft the changes.

Sorry if it is lengthy.  But we need it to be complete.  High-level
summary:  the 2.0 spec is in pretty good shape, though lacking clarity
on a couple of items.  I propose some small changes that will fill those
holes.  (Recognizing that these specs go beyond what most will
implement.)  And I propose ignoring or labelling some silly
combinations.

Please comment...

SOURCES:
=====

Foreground Sources:
f1.) "a" (alpha) of color models RGBa, sRGBa.
f2.) Esc.45 in picture body.
f3.) Auxiliary Color & Transparency elements (CGM:1999)
f4.) Transparent cell color (CGM:1999 & Esc.22).

Background Sources:
b1.) RGB background color specification in PD:
b2.) RGBa background color specification in PD:
b3.) Esc.45 in the picture descriptor:
b4.) <object> elt's 'background' <param>: enable | disable

ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATIONS:
=====

A.) The basics of #f1 and #f2 are handled by Sec.2.2.2 [1].

B.) #f3 is V1 functionality.  Effect is not explicitly defined in WebCGM
combinations with the other transparency effects.  Recommended
meaning:  when Transparency is 'on' (default), then for the inter-dash
spaces (etc) the (Pr, Pg, Pb, Pa) in the equations of [1] is set to
(0,0,0,0) -- transparent black.  When transparency is 'off', then for
inter-dash spaces (etc) the (Pr, Pg, Pb, Pa) is set to (r,g,b,a) of the
Transparent Color.  (If the color model of the metafile is simple RGB,
then (Pr, Pg, Pb, Pa) it is set to (r,g,b,1).)  This is simply a precise
description of the intended meaning of V1 CGM, I think.

C.) #f4 is V1/V3 functionality.  Effect is not explicitly defined in
WebCGM combinations with the other transparency effects.  Recommended
meaning:  for any cell whose color matches the specified TCC, the (Pr,
Pg, Pb, Pa)  for that cell in the equations of [1] is set to (0,0,0,0)
-- transparent black.  This is simply a precise description of the
intended meaning of V1/V3 CGM, I think.

D.) #b1:  Ca in the equations of [1] should be initialized to 0
(opaque);  Cr, Cg, Cb are initialized to the (r,g,b) of the specified
background color.

E.) #b2:  (Cr, Cg, Cb, Ca) in the equations of [1] should be initialized
to the (r,g,b,a) of the specified background color.

F.) #b3:  If the color model is RGB, then (Cr, Cg, Cb, Ca) in the
equations of [1] should be initialized to the (r,g,b,a), where (r,g,b)
is the specified background color and "a" is the Esc.45 alpha value.  If
the color model is RGBa, then ... silly combination ... why would you
have an RGBa specified background color in the PD and then throw in an
Esc.45 element to (re)do what is already done by the "a" of RGBa?  DON'T
DO THIS.

G.) #b4:  After initializing (Cr, Cg, Cb, Ca) according to the contents
of the metafile (#D-F), then:  if 'enable', we're done;  if 'disable',
then replace Ca with 0.0.

PROPOSED CHANGES TO SPEC -- CONCEPTUAL:
=====

Sec.2.2.2 [1] is well-written and provides a foundation for all of this,
without much change.

-- clarify #B by a "Note" in T.18.3 and in T.18.4 [6] that describes as
in #B and points back to Sec.2.2.2 [1].

-- clarify #C by a "Note" in T.18.16 [5] that describes as in #C and
points back to Sec.2.2.2 [1].

-- clarify #D-F by:  *brief* elaboration in Sec.2.2.3 [2] about how
#b1-b3 define the effective background color, which initializes
(Cr,Cg,Cb,Ca) of Sec.2.2.2.  This is basically what is already there,
except being a little more precise and complete.  Ignore the "silly"
case.  (Or alternatively, identify it as a silly thing to do and warn?)

REFERENCES:
=====

[1] Sec. 2.2.2:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/v2.0/OS/WebCGM20-Concepts.html#webcgm_
2_2_2
[2] Sec. 2.2.3:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/v2.0/OS/WebCGM20-Concepts.html#webcgm_
2_2_3
[3] Esc.45:
http://jitc.fhu.disa.mil/nitf/graph_reg/diagrams/esc045.html
[4] Sec. 3.4:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/v2.0/OS/WebCGM20-IC.html#webcgm_3_4
[5] TCC in T.18.16:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/v2.0/OS/WebCGM20-Profile.html#webcgm_4
_7
[6] AuxClr & Trnsp in T.18.3 & T.18.4:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/webcgm/v2.0/OS/WebCGM20-Profile.html#webcgm_4
_7

Regards,
-Lofton.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]