Re: [cgmo-webcgm] New tests

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

At 02:26 PM 8/14/2008 -0400, Bezaire, Benoit wrote:
> [...]
>  
> I added two new tests (about the setView
> port)  to the ftp site. One of them is incomplete however. I wonder
> if it wouldn't be useful to have a createWebCGMRect method? In the first
> test, I wanted to call as few calls as possible to test the setView
> method. 

Could do, if people like the idea.  

(But this would happen in the W3C WG, in response to a WG member comment,
either before or during LC review.  If before, it would be good to
have a complete editing proposal ready, for quick approval once the WG
starts, and immediate integration into the LC text.)

> To me,
> that meant: createWebCGMRect followed by setView.

Thanks,
-Lofton.

p.s.  I noticed 'em there in the directory while working
today.  Question:  name?  The files are just named view001
and view002.  Is plain 'view' to be the test name, or
setView?