[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: More findings about v1-v3 test coverage
Hi All -- Rob has answered another piece of the test-suite-coverage question. This time he looked at coverage of Delimiter Elements. Summary: there is no Compound Line test, anywhere. Other things are either tested in static10 or in the new20tests modules. Let's talk (next telecon) about whether we want a Compound Line test. (Since there is a Closed Figure test, with edges 'on', it would seem trivial to implement, and in fact relatively easy to derive such a test.) -Lofton. >From: Robert Orosz <roboro@auto-trol.com> >To: "Lofton Henderson (E-mail)" <lofton@rockynet.com> >Subject: More findings regarding v1-v3 tests in the test suite. >Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:55:20 -0600 >[...] >Last Wednesday's discussion about the Line Type Initial Offset element and >its applicability to Compound Line got me thinking about whether or not we >have a test in the test suite for Compound Line. I couldn't recall one, so I >implemented the delimiter portion of my scripts (I intend to cover all >element classes when I'm done). > >Sure enough, Compound Line is missing. Also missing, Protection Region and >Compound Text Path although there is one of each in the new20tests >directory. Segments of course are forbidden in WebCGM and Application >Structures don't apply to this portion of the test suite. > >Rob
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]