Re: [cgmo-webcgm] split of getObjectExtent test?

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

At 01:55 PM 11/25/2008 -0500, Bezaire, Benoit wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> I'm wondering if getObjectExtent() shouldn't be
> split into two? Having a separate test with transforms and
> getObjectExtent() would make sense to me. It might increase the chances
> of getting 2 passes on the 'basic' getObjectExtent().
>  
> Just an idea...

It make sense to me.  In general "more atomic" is better
for tests.

Stuart is the owner.  Can you two coordinate about who does
it?

Thanks,
-Lofton.