[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] test update
Lofton, I've looked at the resubmitted lineOffset test, and it is ready to be approved with a lime green status. Issues to be fixed before publication include: 1) WebCGM profile issue, HELVETICA_BOLD is used in the font list. This is a CALS font name and not allowed by WebCGM (should be HELVETICA-BOLD). I believe this comes about because the underscore character is not a valid font name character in the ISO/IEC 9541 standard. 2) Several HTML markup issues, e.g. no alt attribute on the img element. The content of the img element is "</>" and this in particular causes the W3C validator to go crazy. Rob -----Original Message----- From: Forrest Carpenter [mailto:forrest@sdicgm.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:37 AM To: 'Lofton Henderson'; 'WebCGM' Subject: RE: re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] test update Lofton, I have fixed all the issues reported by Don and updated the test suite. Regards, Forrest -----Original Message----- From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:11 AM To: 'WebCGM' Subject: re[2]: [cgmo-webcgm] test update Forrest, these look like pretty simple (editorial) updates. As soon as you do them, I will change the status to TC-approval-pending. (Final approval). Thanks for the prompt reviews, Don. Regards, -Lofton. At 10:59 AM 3/5/2009 -0600, Don wrote: >Lofton, > >My re-review of updated test assigned to me- > > >setGetIntensity- OK > > >setGetLineStyles2.0- > > Description: tests all Web2.0 line styles (picture and APS level) > > change "Web 2.0" to "WebCGM 2.0" > > >setGetFillStyles2.0- > > Description: tests all Web2.0 solid styles (picture and APS level) > > change "Web 2.0" to "WebCGM 2.0" > > >setGetStrokeType- OK > > >setGetStrokeOffset- > > Description: tests line pattern initial offset (APS level) > > should be "tests initial stroke offset property at the APS level" > > >setGetPatternIndex- OK > > >setGetEdgeVisibility- OK > > >setRedraw001- OK > > > >The following test was assigned to Rob and I mistakely reviewed >but I've included my comments for they are worth. > >lineOffset- > > spelling error in the comment inside CGM image "line definations" > > should be "line type definitions" > >Regards, >Don Larson >Larson Software Technology > > > > Rob(1), Don(7) -- you now have the action items on these tests -- please > > review the resubmitted tests. > > > Forrest, thanks for the updates, I have updated the status on them: > > ftp://ftp.cgmlarson.com/test-matrix.htm > > > -Lofton. > > > At 03:13 PM 3/3/2009 -0600, Forrest Carpenter wrote: > > > All, > > > > I have updated the following tests and submit them for review: > > setGetIntensity > > setGetLineStyles2.0 > > setGetFillStyles2.0 > > setGetEdgeVisibility > > setGetStrokeOffset > > setGetPatternIndex > > setGetStrokeType > > lineOffset > > alphaEscape > > > > Regards, > > Forrest > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]