Re: [cgmo-webcgm] UL Review of Tests - WebCGM Compliance

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

Thanks Ulrich.

All -- I will not be able to assess, process and update the matrix till
tomorrow.  Any discussion is welcome.

Thanks,
-Lofton.

At 03:55 PM 3/18/2009 +0100, =?us-ascii?Q?Ulrich_Lasche?= 
wrote:

> All,
>
>  
>
> We have finished our review of the assigned
> test cases and will send a more detailed report soon.  One general
> remark though:
>
>  
>
> I ran all 10 CGMs through MetaCheck with the
> WebCGM option and all files were
> incompliant.  The first error message:
>
>  
>
> Error 6589: WebCGM
> 1.0 (2R) Profile Violation.
>
> The METAFILE DESCRIPTION string is invalid; it
> lacks the phrase
>
> "ProfileEd:1.0" required by the
> Profile. 
>
>  
>
> is clear but still raises an issue.  All
> 10 files contain either ProfileEd:1.0 or 2.0.  In the test files
> that I constructed manually I put in ProfileEd:2.1 (see
> rotateAPS.txt).  Is this correct?
>
>  
>
> While this would be a cosmetic issue there are
> a number of additional errors in these files.  I am wondering if
> there is some compatibility issue between 1.0 and 2.1.  Could you
> please look into the MetaCheck reports (grouped into vendor specific
> zips) and tell me your opinion?
>
>  
>
> Thanks & regards
>
> Ulrich
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC 
> that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS
> at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php