AW: setView001 & setView0002 Reviews?

Hi Lofton,

Attached are our comments on the HTML syntax of all 10 test cases we reviewed. There are comments/questions to each of the 10 cases:

aciDefaultFont.htm:

Line 2: Comment indicator <-- is opened but never closed.

Line 18: <script language="JavaScript"> shouldn't this be something like type="text/ecmascript"?

Line 47: </img> appears, element was never opened.

aciMitreLimit:

Line 19: same as Line 18 above

Line 48: same as Line 47 above

aciRestrictedTextType:

Complete header (HTML & Description) is missing.

Other problems as in aciMitreLimit above.

aciSimpleFontSubsitution.htm:

Problems as in aciDefaultFont above.

lineAnimation:

Line 73: </img> appears, element was never opened.

setGetBGColor.htm:

Line 76: Same as Line 73 above.

Line 93 & 100: <td id="_1">, I am not sure, is it permitted to start an ID with an "_"?

setGetFillOffset.htm:

HTML file is missing.

setGetTextStyles.htm:

Problems/Questions as in setGetBGColor above at various places.

setView001/002.htm:

Problems as in aciMitreLimit above.

Regards

Ulrich

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 29. März 2009 23:45
An: Ulrich_Lasche
Cc: 'WebCGM'
Betreff: setView001 & setView0002 Reviews?

Ulrich,

At 03:55 PM 3/18/2009 +0100, =?us-ascii?Q?Ulrich_Lasche?= wrote:

All,

We have finished our review of the assigned test cases and will send a more detailed report soon. One general remark though:

I ran all 10 CGMs through MetaCheck with the WebCGM option and all files were incompliant. [...]

Rob tells me that setView001 and setView002 are metachek-okay if we accept profileEd 2.0, which I think we have agreed to do.

Do you intend "more detailed report" about these two tests? They are ready to progress, depending on whether or not you have more review results (content, correctness, etc).

Thanks,
-Lofton.

cgmo-webcgm message