Re: [cgmo-webcgm] aci test review

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

Don -- 

1.) Per Forrest's review, I have marked the action back to you on these
tests:  
aciFontNormalization, aciGenericFonts, aciMapListOrder, aciLineAttr,
aciEdgeAttr.

2.) Forrest passed aciLineEdgeDef,
aciHatchStyleDef, so they are ready for TAP.  I checked them for
camel-case -- A-ok.

3.) Camel-case is the only issue that Forrest found on
aciMapListOrder.  So it could go to TAP as soon as you make that
simple fix.

(Good idea to check that on all the aci tests, as well as those instances
that Forrest pointed out.)

Forrest, thanks for the reviews.

-Lofton.

[1]
ftp://ftp.cgmlarson.com/test-matrix.htm
(r2)

At 02:56 PM 4/20/2009 -0500, Forrest Carpenter wrote:

> Don,
>  
> Review of aci tests:
>  
> aciFontNormalization  aci file is valid; minor correction, the description in the htm file refers to 5 strings and there are only 3 in the file. 
>  
> aciGenericFonts aci file in invalid. According to the dtd     fontmap should be fontMap
> <maplist
>       cgmFont="Courier"
>             substitutionList="serif"
>       cgmFont="Times-Roman"
>             substitutionList="sans-serif"
>  
> should be 
> <maplist
>       cgmFont="Courier"
>             substitutionList="serif"/>
> <maplist
>       cgmFont="Times-Roman"
>             substitutionList="sans-serif"/>
>  
> the CGM and HTM files are good.
>  
> aciMapListOrder  aci file is invalid fontmap should be fontMap; the CGM and HTM files are good
>  
> aciLineAttr aci file is valid; the reference image shows the third line from the top to be dashed, it should be solid. It would be helpful it the lines weights were thicker so the cap and join styles would be more distinguishable.
>  
> aciEdgeAttr the aci file is valid; it would be helpful if the edge widths thicker so the cap and join styles would be more distinguishable.
>  
> aciLineEdgeDef the aci file is valid; the CGM and HTM files are good
>  
> aciHatchStyleDef the aci file is valid; the CGM and HTM files are good
>  
>