OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cgmo-webcgm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: AW: [cgmo-webcgm] Re-submittals of my 6 tests


Hi All,

 

I checked the test cases below and have no more comments on five of them (please proceed to TAP).  But I still don't understand the setGetFillOffset example, or may be I don't understand this function, or may be there is a problem in MetaWeb.

 

Attached to this mail is a screenshot I am getting when launching the example.  The original image, as displayed in MetaWeb, can be seen on the left, while the reference image (I guess) shows the view after the shift operation.  Or is it the initial view as well?  In this case, either MetaWeb or the generator is wrong in the pattern interpretation as a shift in the fill offset cannot result in a rotation of the image (from what I see in the CGM the complete pattern is already in view).  I would be grateful if somebody could check the correct display and let me know his opinion.

 

Also, in the spec we are saying:

 

"fill-offset sets a reference point for patterns or hatch fills within the target object (APS or picture). Fill-offset corresponds to the CGM attribute element FILL REFERENCE POINT and overrides the current values of that attribute within the target object (APS or picture)"

 

In Forrest's example the fill-offset is applied to the cgmpic object, i.e. the picture.  What does it mean to apply a fill offset to a picture?  Should all patterns in all fill areas within the picture be shifted, regardless how many objects there are and if the patterns are different?  This would then mean that the bracket within the rectangle should shift to the lower-left corner of the picture/rectangle as described (except that MetaWeb would shift it out of view).  Is this a correct interpretation?

 

Thanks for your comments

Ulrich

 

 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. April 2009 01:45
An: 'WebCGM'
Betreff: Re: [cgmo-webcgm] Re-submittals of my 6 tests

 

Ulrich -- the action item returns to you for these 6 tests.  Can you please confirm whether or not they are now ready to advance to TAP status?

Forrest, thanks for the resubmissions.

-Lofton.

[1] ftp://ftp.cgmlarson.com/test-matrix.htm

At 05:03 PM 4/20/2009 -0500, Forrest Carpenter wrote:


All,
 
I have fixed the html errors and some other minor issues in the following tests:
 
setGetBGColor,
setGetTextStyles,
setGetInteriorStyle,
setGetHatchIndex,
setGetFillOffset,
lineAnimation

 
Regards,
Forrest

FillOffset.jpg



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]