RE: AW: [cgmo-webcgm] getObjectExtent tests

["Galt, Stuart A" <stuart.a.galt@boeing.com>]

I am confused now.

 

When I run http://validator.w3.org/check with the file that I loaded (with the <?xml... on the first line and the

meta tag like I typed)  I get the message "This docuement was successfully checked as HTML 4.01 Transitional"

 

What am I doing wrong?

 

 

--
Stuart Galt
SGML Resource Group
stuart.a.galt@boeing.com
(206) 544-3656

 

---

From: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 6:15 AM
To: 'CGM Open WebCGM TC'
Cc: 'David Cruikshank'
Subject: Re: AW: [cgmo-webcgm] getObjectExtent tests

Stuart -- issues of the text extent aside, the action is back to you to fix the markup errors (also in getObjectExtentTransformed?).

Ulrich, thanks for the review.

-Lofton.

[1] ftp://ftp.cgmlarson.com/test-matrix.htm

At 12:23 PM 4/27/2009 +0200, Ulrich Läsche wrote:

Hi All,

 

Leaving out the discussion about the text entent (which should be tested independently, IMO) the getObjectExtent test still shows 17 errors when running it through the W3C validator.  These errors can simply be cured in just deleting the first line of the file:

 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

 

If you delete this line all errors are gone.  Also, the statement about the character code is ineffective.  If you replace the line:

 

<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">

 

with

 

<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">

 

the file passes the validator without any complaints.

 

Regards

Ulrich

 

 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 24. April 2009 16:19
An: CGM Open WebCGM TC
Betreff: [cgmo-webcgm] getObjectExtent tests

 

All --

 

Although the matrix shows Ulrich & Forrest with review action items, I have

also marked them 'reworking'.  I suspect, from the gOE(text) thread, that

there may be some revision needed.  We will work this out next week in

telecon discussion.

 

I wonder ... would it make sense to segregate gOE(text) into a test all by

itself?  I'm not recommending it, just thinking about it.  (I suspect, if

anyone fails the gOE test, it would be because of the text string.)

 

Regards,

-Lofton.

 

[1] ftp://ftp.cgmlarson.com/test-matrix.htm