[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: AW: [cgmo-webcgm] getObjectExtent tests
Hi Stuart, Attached is the screen I am getting when checking the
file from the ftp site. I am checking
the file with the option “Validate by File Upload”. May be, somebody else should check to make
sure it’s not system depending. Regards Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche
Nachricht----- Von: Galt, Stuart A
[mailto:stuart.a.galt@boeing.com] Gesendet: Montag, 27.
April 2009 16:52 An: Cc: Betreff: RE: AW: [cgmo-webcgm] getObjectExtent tests I am confused now. When I run http://validator.w3.org/check with the
file that I loaded (with the <?xml... on the first line and the meta tag
like I typed) I get the message "This docuement was successfully
checked as HTML 4.01 Transitional" What am I doing wrong? -- Stuart Galt SGML Resource Group stuart.a.galt@boeing.com (206) 544-3656 From: Sent: Monday, April 27, 2009 6:15 AM To: ' Cc: ' Subject: Re: AW: [cgmo-webcgm] getObjectExtent tests Stuart -- issues of the text extent aside, the action
is back to you to fix the markup errors (also in getObjectExtentTransformed?). Ulrich, thanks for the review. -Lofton. [1] ftp://ftp.cgmlarson.com/test-matrix.htm At 12:23 PM 4/27/2009 +0200, Ulrich Läsche wrote: Hi All, Leaving out the discussion about the text entent
(which should be tested independently, IMO) the getObjectExtent test still
shows 17 errors when running it through the W3C validator. These errors
can simply be cured in just deleting the first line of the file: <?xml version="1.0"
encoding="UTF-8"?> If you delete this line all errors are gone. Also,
the statement about the character code is ineffective. If you replace the
line: <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> with <meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> the file passes the validator without any complaints. Regards Ulrich |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]