Re: [cgmo-webcgm] Action Items

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

At 02:25 PM 9/9/2009 +0200, Ulrich Laesche wrote:
> Hi Lofton,
>  
> Attached below you will find the status of my action items.  I
> copied the part relating to me from the mail of the archive list:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200909/msg00002.html
>
> Regards
> Ulrich
>  
>  
> Test Suite updates, due this week (4-sep):
> ----------
>  
> UL:  review new transformXCF [due: 04-sep]
> The test looks OK to me.  We don t support XCF yet but I checked the
> coordinates and results with the Java Script version Stuart provided
> during the F2F.

Accordingly, I have changed status back to "Approved" for this
test.

>  
> UL:  review new setGetFillOffset2 [due: 04-sep]
> The test looks OK to me.  We don t support fill offset in MetaWeb
> but the syntax etc looks OK.

Accordingly, I will set the status to "Approved" for this
test.

>  
>  Implementation achievements due this week (4-sep):
> ----------
> UL,DL,FC:  unknown->pass for new test setGetFillOffset2 [due:
> 04-sep]
>
> We don t support Fill Offset in Metaweb.

Okay.

>  
> Implementation achievements due next week (11-sep):
> ----------
> UL:  fail->pass for fixed test aciLineEdgeTypeDef 
> [due:  15-sep]
>
> We are working on implementing this functionality.

Okay ... awaiting those results before changing matrix.   (past
due)

>  
> Tests that have changed and require retesting now for ALL
> ----------
> [Please send your results for these changed tests to LH.]
>  
> BB,DL,FC,UL:  [due:  4-sep]
>          setGetTextStyles,
> setGetLineStyles2.0, setGetFillStyles2.0,
>         
> setGetStrokeType
>
> We are planning on supporting these tests but only pass the get function
> part so far.

Okay ... awaiting those results before changing matrix.   (past
due)

>  Other:
> ----------
> [Please send your results for these to LH.]
>  
> BB,DL,FC,UL:  [due:  4-sep]
>
>          setGetFillOffset2,
> spXCF, transformXCF
>
> We don t support XCF & Fill Offset yet.

Okay.  (As I understand, you don't have plans to support these, and
since MetaWeb didn't do Interpolated Interior in TS2.0, then the new fill
offset test would be problematic).

Ulrich, summarizing your TS actions [1]:  6 tests have UL actions
due.  (The pending TS republication cannot proceed until these are
done.)

All -- I'll put out an updated AI list soon, to update the above
referenced msg00002.

Regards,
-Lofton.
 
[1]
ftp://ftp.cgmlarson.com/test-matrix.html