[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: editing
Dave, (and CGM Open members/implementors ... speak up if you think my interpretation is wrong.) At 12:50 PM 4/9/01 -0700, you wrote: >[...]I find two spellings "pictseqno" and "picseqno" in the Intelligent >Content section (3). picseqno is define in the BNR and used in >examples. pictseqno is used in the BNR and examples....which should it be? The BNF says: pictsequence ::= "pictseqno(" picseqno ("," behavior)? ")" picseqno ::= [0-9]+ which is okay -- pictseqno is a terminal in the grammar (a literal keyword), and picseqno is a non-terminal production. Then the next paragraph uses picseqno as the keyword (whereas in the BNF the keyword is clearly picseqno). There is similar BNF for pictid (the keyword) and picid (non-terminal), but the paragraph in question correctly uses the keyword pictid. Pictseqno is used in examples 3 & 4. I do not find picseqno used in any examples. In the balance, I think the two usages in 3.1.2.1 of picseqno are wrong and need to be changed to pictseqno. (Implementors, does anyone object vigorously?) -Lofton.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC