OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cgmopen-members message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: editing -- oops, correction


Lofton,

> pictsequence ::= "pictseqno(" picseqno ("," behavior)? ")"
> picseqno ::= [0-9]+

I read picseqno as a placeholder for a number between 0 and 9, so it will
never be used as a keyword or expression inside the CGM. So a correct
fragment would read

picTseqno(0,_self)

and NOT

picseqno(0,_self)

Dieter

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lofton Henderson" <lofton@rockynet.com>
To: "Cruikshank, David W" <David.Cruikshank@PSS.Boeing.com>
Cc: <cgmopen-members@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 12:48 AM
Subject: RE: editing -- oops, correction


> (Oops, I myself fell into the trap of the similar spellings.  Below I have
> corrected one "picseqno" mis-use to "picTseqno".  CAPITAL T is for
emphasis
> only...)
>
> Dave,
>
> (and CGM Open members/implementors ... speak up if you think my
> interpretation is wrong.)
>
> At 12:50 PM 4/9/01 -0700, you wrote:
> >[...]I find two spellings "pictseqno" and "picseqno" in the Intelligent
> >Content section (3).  picseqno is define in the BNR and used in
> >examples.  pictseqno is used in the BNR and examples....which should it
be?
>
> The BNF says:
>
> pictsequence ::= "pictseqno(" picseqno ("," behavior)? ")"
> picseqno ::= [0-9]+
>
> which is okay -- picTseqno is a terminal in the grammar (a literal
> keyword), and picseqno is a non-terminal production.  Then the next
> paragraph uses picseqno as the keyword (whereas in the BNF the keyword is
> clearly picTseqno).  There is similar BNF for picTid (the keyword) and
> picid (non-terminal), but the paragraph in question correctly uses the
> keyword picTid.
>
> PicTseqno is used in examples 3 & 4.  I do not find picseqno used in any
> examples.
>
> In the balance, I think the two usages in 3.1.2.1 of picseqno are wrong
and
> need to be changed to picTseqno.
>
> (Implementors, does anyone object vigorously?)
>
> -Lofton.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: cgmopen-members-request@lists.oasis-open.org
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC