RE: editing -- oops, correction

["Cruikshank, David W" <David.Cruikshank@PSS.Boeing.com>]

ok, so I think the editing directive is to change the 2 occurrances of picseqno in 3.1.2.1 to pictseqno...I'll go ahead and do that.

thx..dave

> ----------
> From: 	Lofton Henderson[SMTP:lofton@rockynet.com]
> Sent: 	Monday, April 09, 2001 3:48 PM
> To: 	Cruikshank, David W
> Cc: 	cgmopen-members@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: 	RE: editing -- oops, correction
> 
> (Oops, I myself fell into the trap of the similar spellings.  Below I have 
> corrected one "picseqno" mis-use to "picTseqno".  CAPITAL T is for emphasis 
> only...)
> 
> Dave,
> 
> (and CGM Open members/implementors ... speak up if you think my 
> interpretation is wrong.)
> 
> At 12:50 PM 4/9/01 -0700, you wrote:
> >[...]I find two spellings "pictseqno" and "picseqno" in the Intelligent 
> >Content section (3).  picseqno is define in the BNR and used in 
> >examples.  pictseqno is used in the BNR and examples....which should it be?
> 
> The BNF says:
> 
> pictsequence ::= "pictseqno(" picseqno ("," behavior)? ")"
> picseqno ::= [0-9]+
> 
> which is okay -- picTseqno is a terminal in the grammar (a literal 
> keyword), and picseqno is a non-terminal production.  Then the next 
> paragraph uses picseqno as the keyword (whereas in the BNF the keyword is 
> clearly picTseqno).  There is similar BNF for picTid (the keyword) and 
> picid (non-terminal), but the paragraph in question correctly uses the 
> keyword picTid.
> 
> PicTseqno is used in examples 3 & 4.  I do not find picseqno used in any 
> examples.
> 
> In the balance, I think the two usages in 3.1.2.1 of picseqno are wrong and 
> need to be changed to picTseqno.
> 
> (Implementors, does anyone object vigorously?)
> 
> -Lofton.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: cgmopen-members-request@lists.oasis-open.org
>