another WebCGM spec glitch

[Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>]

CGM Open Members (esp vendors) --

Please consider and reply ASAP -- WebCGM 1.0 Second Release is dependent 
upon answers.

Now that it is clearly specified that WebCGM SF strings are **case 
sensitive**, we have a little cleanup to do.

The content model of section 3.3 disagrees with the individual sections 
3.2.1.1 - 3.2.1.4 and sections 3.2.2.1 - 3.2.2.8.  Everything in the 
Content Model is lower case, and the sections tend to use "camel 
case".  (Both the content model and the sections are normatively referenced 
from the PPF, so we need to clean it up.).

Specifically:

CM			Sections
====================
layer			(same)
grobject		(same)
para			(same)
subpara		(same)	

region			(same)
viewcontext		ViewContext
linkuri			LinkURI
layername		LayerName
layerdescription	LayerDescription	
screentip		ScreenTip
name			(same)
content		(same)

It would be nice to pick a consistent style (like all lower case, or all 
camel case).  But more important is:  what has been implemented?  I suspect 
that viewer implementations rely on case-insensitive (and if I were an 
viewer implementor, I would continue to be forgiving, regardless of what 
the spec says).

What about content?  What have people generated so far?  (MetaCheck will 
not be forgiving, so we may as well preserve validity of as much content as 
possible.)

Please send your votes and comments as soon as possible.

Regards,
-Lofton.

*******************
Lofton Henderson
1919 Fourteenth St., #604
Boulder, CO   80302

Phone:  303-449-8728
Email:  lofton@rockynet.com
*******************